Him
July 28, 2008
He stood shirtless with a cigarette hanging from his mouth, waiting for the electric stove to heat so he could light up. Priscilla, why do you like me? A question that jarred me a bit, and I laughed it off at first until realizing the seriousness of his eyes. Because you make me laugh. It was my first thought. And he thinks me skewed of mind because he says only I find him hysterical. Then I’ve been crazy from the beginning, eight years and counting. Finally the cigarette burned an orange hue, and ashes began to fall. Leaning against the sink, he said nothing, merely inhaling and exhaling.
Outside on the steps, he finally said aloud what I knew he had always felt. You’re better than me. You deserve so much better. Why have you not seen that?
How can I say it all to where he’ll believe. I’ve never judged him on his social class, his choices made all these years. I never see the man who fights addiction. I only see him. My friend. A man I once loved. The first I ever loved. But these months have tested our friendship. Devastated me. Made me crumble. And now we stand on the brink of rebirth, but it is a place where both hesitate to go. Never have we returned to the same wave length. Over the years it is only one at a time willing to venture back to what we had in the past.
I thought I had finally done it. I had lost you. And the thought of doing anything to lose you, our friendship, I just can’t, Priscilla.
And now we remain in limbo. Hearing him feel this, knowing how he holds me so dear, it makes me tremble. I kiss him on the forehead, the cheek, the arm, and I wrap myself around him. Eight years is so long to know a soul. I have seen him at his best, his worst, near death. And it is only now that we can share aloud the extent of the complexities of this strange relationship. I tell him the truth. He devastated me, but only because I had no power to save him. How scared I was that one day I’d be too late to get to him before overdose triumphed. And I see the scars on his wrists, and it terrifies me to think he forgot how precious he is to me and others.
I tell him it is no matter which beast lies within him. Every man I have loved is greatly flawed. Either in need to possess me, control me. To be distant as if across the world from me, to scathe at my emotions and abandon me. No, the beast he fights he is confronting, and he sees me in a way I wish the others could have before they broke me. But now, after so long, I feel loved in a way I’ve never known. We may never venture back to the romantic, but this friendship is unyielding, and has survived tribulations unlike anything either of us could have imagined.
No, I do not always understand him. At times his decisions break my heart. But I am unmoving. Never do I lose faith in the man I’ve known. Never do I think his potential forever lost. I only wish he could believe in himself as much as I do, but I suppose he thinks the same of me. He sees my love choices, my artistic fears, my moments of paralysis from acting, and I see him shaking his head wondering why I can’t see myself like he does me.
I do not always feel beautiful or creative, talented or deserving. There is good chance I am faking it so others won’t see me self questioning. And I am even more surprised when I am found to be these things by others. It perplexes me because I see myself as a paradox, an intellectual mess, a blind woman searching in the dark. At times I feel so alone. Other times overwhelmed by the presence of others. Logical and illogical. Accomplished and a failure. And then I realize, no one is fond of an insecure person. Often if this is sensed, it is only because I am over thinking it, and projecting it. So, I’ve worked on letting it go. Forgetting to worry about the opinions of others. Either they will befriend me or go. Why should it matter?
I wish I could see me like he does. I hope he will realize how much he is loved by those around him. We are two scarred souls that have refused to abandon one another. Though we have failed at being faithful to so much in life, it is this friendship that holds, and I cherish it so much more than others know.
I seem to possess an insatiable urge to know, to understand, to feel and yet go unnoticed if possible. I’ve been awestruck by the human condition. So often I find myself slightly removed, as if watching a Discovery documentary on the tele. I can’t help but notice their habits, choice of words, how one reacts in the context of the situation at hand. I’m eternally studying.
I sought them out without knowing what I’d unearth. Waking up late, I assumed it’d be trying to find protesters out in midmorning, but there were the Gardners on a congested street corner next to a Burger King and Carta bus stop. Kathy pushed baby dolls in a stroller, and John toted a laced bonnet plastic baby across his chest. At the sight of them, I felt compelled to know them. It didn’t matter that I’m Pro-Choice. There was no intent for debate or quarrel. Something in me wanted to be witness to their story, and if they had not wanted ears to listen, surely they wouldn’t be such public advocates for their beliefs. So I grabbed a small notepad, pen and my camera, and walked to Kathy to shake her hand. And so the hour began…
John is the fire, all consuming is his passion for this cause and his lord. Kathy the quiet woman of few words that concedes the spotlight for him. She’s heard these stories for years. Seen John trial and error for seventeen years. And he barely stops for breath as he speaks, trying to get out the stories and memories as if time is dying away. They stand in the heat, and drivers honk in concurrence to their signs or yell for choice. And now I’m seeing the documentary from another perspective, I have treaded on the ground of the other, and to strangers, I am automatically affiliated with the Gardners.
My plight, my purpose in this was to expand my horizon of knowledge. I no longer wanted to stop at the black and white line of Pro-Life and Pro-Choice, two sides that speak through painted signs. I wanted to crack the visage of stereotypes and propaganda from all facets in this complex social issue and see those that hide beneath the umbrella terms of these stances.
What I found was a man of dedication and passion. He is no couch potato advocate, cursing at the socio-political world through the safety net of a house and a glass fronted box. Three days a week he is out, he is active, he hopes to change the minds of a world he thinks is lost, even if it’s one person at a time. I was more concerned of Kathy, who’s short history of active participation with her husband surprised me. I waited thirty minutes for John to rest his tongue so I could delve into her story. Where had she been for fifteen years while he attended protests, wrote letters, and stood on town corners? Why so invisible for so long? But I could get so little from her. All she spoke of was killing babies is wrong, and the pictures, and the women who changed their mind, her family. She told me that she has a niece who is addicted to drugs but decided abortion is wrong and had her children, though they no longer speak to a mother whose bond is best with alcohol and highs. It seems her mission stops at having the babies, but who helps raise those babies up to women and men? What resources are they promised and actually given? There is so much entailed with the idea of not just “giving” life but “sustaining” life, “nurturing” life.
I tried to play with that idea awhile, hoping she’d bite. Why no other avenues for this activism? But she only cited counseling onsite at clinics, hoping women changed their minds at the last minute. I thought, “What about pregnancy prevention? Free birth control for women?” It seemed the only prevention of importance was abortion prevention, as I found adoption is somewhat looked down upon as well, though still preferable to the alternative.
And the Feminist in me was wanting to shake her. I wanted her to think beyond John, beyond biblical. What do you, as Kathy Gardner, think of this situation? But asking a person to strip herself of the contexts that link to her identity and thus, analysis and understanding of the world, is somewhat impossible. She organizes her cosmos around her marriage and religion, and it is the functions of her life, it is the story she is a part of, and I wonder if she realizes she could write another tale to be protagonist of.
When my friends asked what I did with my Saturday, I got various reactions to sharing that I interviewed and photographed anti-abortion protesters. My Pro-Life friends seemed surprised, but I think more so in the fact that I didn’t debate especially since I’ve likely debated the issue with these friends. And I do not deny that I get quite impassioned…excessively analytical…irked…loud…sometimes resorting to name calling and hanging up the phone. Other friends have enjoyed being audience to me in full debate mode, never seeing me more on point and countering with well thought reasons. My Pro-Choice friends were equally surprised and more so perplexed. I did get some automatic detesting responses directed at the protesters, but like I’ve stated, the point was the go beyond the idea of them being the “other” and seeing who they are, putting names to the faces, hearing the lives of the people that hold the signs.
I will say that this is likely territory that will never be resolved though. There is so much diversity in both the Pro-Life and Pro-Choice worlds in regards to advocates and people. I barely dabbled into the schisms within Pro-Life activists and groups when Kathy discussed her disappointment with another group in Columbia. But what is likely the decisive factor is the perspective in which both sides come from. Pro-Lifers usually take their view based on religious beliefs and texts. Pro-Choicers, I think, attempt to remove religion as a “rational” framework to determine if things like abortion are right or wrong.
Personally, I believe all social issues are not conducive to a black or white mentality. There is too much room for the gray, too many variables that cannot be controlled. I made the decision to be Pro-Choice because I believe there should be options, especially to be more adaptable to the myriad of scenarios that can result in pregnancy. I think about what rights I feel I deserve, and why would I deprive anyone of those rights? The answer is, I wouldn’t. And I dislike that often it is misconstrued that Pro-Choice is Pro-Abortion because it’s not. Pro-Choice just has to heavily advocate for an option that Pro-Life denies, but in the end, each choice should be considered thoughtfully, and each choice deserves equal consideration. And each choice will lead to a series of consequences and emotions that often aren’t focused upon with birthing, adoption, and abortion. I fear that it is to often considered the end of the situation when the choice is made and executed, but in reality, the choice made is only the beginning to whatever that decision entails. And that is a part of the process that seems seriously neglected after all this time.
Abstract Self
July 20, 2008
Conversations with Anti-Abortion Protesters
July 20, 2008
Walking along the sidewalk of Hwy 61, Kathy and John Gardner silently advocate their Pro-Life message. She pushes a stroller of two baby dolls and a lamb stuffed animal with a sign attached stating, “Stop Abortion Now.” Her husband carries the same sign, and has a baby doll adorned with a lace bonnet and an inked tear drop on its left eye.
Drivers honk as they pass, some in agreement, others roll down a window and yell, “Pro-Choice!” before speeding away. “These girls threw eggs at us one time,” Kathy said, “But a car got hit instead.” These reactions no longer unnerve the Gardners. John’s seventeen years of activism have resulted in a myriad of reactions. “A cop lied on him once,” Kathy started, “In court. Lied in court.” Mr. Gardner recalled the incident saying the officer said he had leaned too much of his body into a person’s car and was walking in the middle of the street protesting, but John claims none of it was true. Another time, a person fired a BB gun on him, leaving small welts for months. There have been other memorable reactions, such as a man that slipped five dollars into his pocket one day. “I know he didn’t agree with the cause,” said John, “but I think he liked my dedication. And I didn’t want to preach too much because that’d just push some away. I don’t want to turn a soul away from one day being saved.”
Asked about his initial motivation to begin Pro-Life activism, Mr. Gardner says he’s never personally known someone whose had an abortion. Before becoming a born again Christian, John was an alcoholic, facing the same problems his father had. “I wasn’t fit to be a woman’s husband,” he said, “But then I got saved. And I felt a call to preach.” He began his plight on the steps of the State House in Columbia, South Carolina. After a rally on the anniversary of Roe VS Wade in 1991, Mr. Gardner felt he was called to the cause. He returned several days later with a simple anti-abortion sign, and his mission has persisted ever since. Branching out from their hometown of Columbia, the Gardners travel every Monday, Thursday and Saturday to another location in Charleston, Greenville, or Florence. When not on the road, John spends time trying to gain support from government representatives. He had an ally in House representative Ralph Davenport, who attempted to push two bills through. The first bill was the Right to Life Act, and the second was to construct a monument for unborn children. Legislative details and a drawing of the monument are included in Mr. Gardner’s newsletter from his organization Voice of the Unborn, which he hands out to drivers during red lights. The purpose for the monument is outlined in the newsletter: “We will never outlaw abortion until we become repentant and sorrowful for the awful sin we have committed. This monument will express our remorse and sorrow for allowing these murders to go on for years. People will come from all over the world to see this monument as a result. Many children will be saved from murder.”
When asked about other possible methods to go about their cause, Kathy and John discussed previous ties to other Pro-Life organizations and counseling women on-site at clinics. Mrs. Gardner conveyed her frustrations with a Catholic activism group who she felt were pursuing “Band-aid fixes, but nothing ever got done.” After the director of the organization spoke out against the monument bill, the Gardners severed ties with the group. As for counseling, the majority of women still decided to terminate their pregnancies, which Mr. Gardner expressed pained him greatly, but the small amount who changed their decisions gave him great joy. Kathy described a neighbor whose daughter had become pregnant, and originally intended to seek an abortion, but learning of John’s activism, changed her mind. Mrs. Gardner said they bought several outfits for the newborn; happy to see they had made a change. Mr. Gardner remembered another occasion when he was out on the corner of road protesting. He said one young woman waved him over to her car and had a toddler in the backseat. She told him that several years ago she had seen him on the street with his message, and it was because of him that her daughter was born.
In the beginning, John focused on protesting at clinics where Dr. Jessie Floyd worked. One day, Dr. Floyd was sideswiped by another vehicle. He was killed on impact, but his grandson survived. Mr. Gardner said he didn’t take joy in Dr. Floyd’s death, but that he took joy in the fact that no more babies would be murdered. He estimated that Dr. Floyd performed over 30,000 procedures in the time John knew him. Mr. Gardner said he thought the wreck had a message, “God saved the grandson. He saved the child.” Since Dr. Floyd’s death, Kathy says four of his five clinics have shutdown that he started.
Throughout Mr. Gardner’s activism, he has predominately worked alone. It is only within the last couple of years that his wife, Kathy, has joined him. When asked about her motivation to be a part of John’s message, she said for her it’s about saving babies. “Have you ever seen pictures of babies after abortions? The babies look like they been torn to pieces. Arms and legs pulled off.” This is an image she reverts back to repeatedly when discussing their mission. She makes a point to wear a shirt with a picture of her three year old grandson ironed onto the front; so people will see the child in her life.
Whether or not one agrees with their beliefs, the Gardners’ method of activism is nonviolent and is protected by the First Amendment. It is surprising the aggressive reactions such passive activism has received, which brings to light a concerning facet within the divide between Pro-Life and Pro-Choice groups and individuals. Since when has taking a side caused a wall prohibiting communication and dialog to emerge?
Religious Ill-Literacy
July 7, 2008
The U.S. is simultaneously saturated with religion and ignorance of religion. A paradox that isn’t to be worn like a medal of honor. In a country where religion is an undercurrent in a myriad of political issues and even practitioners’ swing votes cause presidential nominees to gravitate to Evangelicals and their ideologies, it is inexcusable that knowledge of religions is absent or greatly distorted. Even Christians seem to lack information about the historical origins and development of their religion. In fact, many Christians I know hardly peruse the Bible that adorns their nightstand or coffee table. Typically, they site ‘faith’ as the foundation of their religion, and because of that, the history and study of Christianity is viewed as irrelevant. The past isn’t applicable to their present. What happened in 2 C.E. is insignificant in comparison to going through a divorce, having to raise a teenager, or figuring out how to manage all the household bills.
If Christians do little to delve into the history of their own tradition, then it isn’t surprising that their religious illiteracy is pervasive, but that just brings to light the graveness of the situation. There is no critical analysis of the nation’s leading religion. Why do Christian practitioners not notice Jesus’ inclusion of women as his followers but not questions the oppression women have had socially in their societies? Why are the edits of the Bible not discussed? Changing words, excluding passage, and including passages alter biblical texts and their interpretations drastically. Why is cultural context never a thought in passage analysis? How has Christianity changed over its years of existence? These are all pertinent questions, but ones that don’t seem to be of importance to contemporary Christians. Social issues and the interpretation from a pulpit standing leader seem to have drawn focus away from individual thought and action.
Post 9/11, there were reports of attacks on immigrants who were thought to be Muslim. In actuality, the victims were Sikh. In no way is malicious and violent action condoned, but that simple distinction in headdress alone is absent in religious knowledge in the U.S. I once had a relative ask me if the word ‘love’ is to be found anywhere in the Qur’an, and it was difficult to swallow my disgust. The term Islam translates into “submission” or “surrender” to God. It does not mean hijack planes and attack the U.S. The 5 Pillars of Islam do not include jihad (and even then, the interpretation of jihad extends beyond mainstream views). The foundation of Islam is based on these pillars: profession of faith, ritual prayer, tithing, fasting particularly during Ramadan, and a pilgrimage to Mecca. No where is violent means mentioned at the heart of this tradition. People fail to realize that interpretations on the fringe are what gain most media exposure and command attention. I am always inclined to remember a phrase, “the silent majority.” The small group of Muslims who caused 9/11 should not be held as a blanket definition for their tradition. Just like there are numerous Christianities, there are numerous Islams. And when people associate violence and oppression with Islam, I ask that they turn to their own tradition and site the Inquisition, the witch trials, the Crusades, etc. How many lives were slaughtered? Christian deaths by Christian hands. Non-Christian deaths by Christian hands. For a succinct Christian history, I suggest the following: Christianity.
Considering ourselves the melting pot of the world, and being a primary force in international relations, it should be considered a responsibility for people to be knowledgeable of other traditions, especially their own! The separation of Church and State has awarded the religious freedom that the U.S. possesses, but it has not yet found a way to compensate for its absence in institutions that greatly influence citizens, particularly in the public school system. Here in the south, courses involving teaching the Bible as literature are being developed and introduced into public schools, but it’s being taught by teachers not educated with a Religious Studies background (preferably from an academic standpoint, not theological).
Religion can be included in academic environments without a theological agenda, but this has never been supplemented since extracting religious education from the public school system. The absence of religious education hasn’t replaced the multifaceted existence of religion in people’s lives and in societies. Obviously, the ignorance of such is resulting in grave consequences.
It can no longer be ignored that the world is a pluralistic place, and the responsibility entailed with living in a multicultural, multi-religious world should no longer be shirked by people.
Disoriented
July 5, 2008
The Lotus Uprising…
July 4, 2008
This new blog is meant to be the unapologetic expressions of an artist, a young woman, a human being. Raw. Emotive. My Truth.
It is an uprising in thought. To awake minds. Foster a schism. Introspection on public display.
Here, I will lay it all down. To sleep. To grow restless. To birth inspiration. All in hopes that I am a lotus rising, through the muck, to find myself, to find what is purifying to my soul. A mere spotted reflection, but I’m polishing the mirror as we speak. Beneath the distortion is all I seek. To have the veil lifted. To SEE.
Darshan…

